Research
Article
I
Bond strength of ceramic or resin CAD-CAM laminate
veneers
Metin Bakir, dds, phd, Şehmus Bakir, dds, phd & Emrullah Bahsi, dds, phd
Abstract: Purpose: To compare the bond strength of ceramic
or resin laminate veneers produced using computer assisted design/computer
assisted machining (CAD-CAM). Methods: 80 teeth were prepared for laminate veneer, and divided into eight groups of
different CAD-CAM blocks in each group. Each group was restored with the
manufacturers’ recommended procedures. After cementation of the veneers, all
samples were thermocycled (1,000 cycles); the crowns
of the teeth were embedded vertically into acrylic blocks and subjected to
shear bond strength in a universal tester. Shear bond strength was determined
in Newtons (N). Results: The tests showed 52.5% cohesive failure, 30% adhesive failure, and 17.5%
adhesive-cohesive failure (mixed). Lava Ultimate had the highest bond strength
average and the Cerec blocks had the lowest with 82.2N.
Lava Ultimate, Cerasmart, and E-Max’s shear bond
strength values were statistically different compared to Vitablocs Mark II, Cerec Blocs, GC Initial LRF Blocks (P<
0.05). The difference between the Vitablocs Mark II and Cerec Blocs and the Vita Enamic block was statistically significant. There was no statistically significant
difference among the other groups. The selected CAD-CAM material affected the
shear bond strength of the laminate veneers. (Am J Dent 2020;33:287-290).
Clinical significance: The results of this study can
assist clinicians in selecting materials with a high bond strength for laminate
veneers.
Mail: Dr. Metin Bakir, Department
of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Bingol University, Postal Code: 12100, Campus, Bingol,
Turkey. E-mail: metinbakir88@gmail.com
A randomized controlled clinical trial of two types of
lithium disilicate
Edoardo Ferrari Cagidiaco, dds, msc, Roberto
Sorrentino, dds, msc, phd, Denise
I.K. Pontoriero, dds
Abstract: Purpose: This randomized controlled
clinical trial evaluated the behavior of lithium disilicate partial crowns by means of a novel Functional Index for Teeth (FIT). Methods: 105 subjects in need of at
least a single prosthetic restoration in posterior areas were treated with
adhesive partial crowns (for a total of 170 restorations) onto natural vital
abutment teeth and followed-up annually for 4 years. Subjects were randomly
divided into two experimental groups: Group 1, e.max Press and Group 2, Initial LiSi Press. FIT was used for the objective assessment
of outcomes including clinical and radiographic examinations. A dropout rate of
4.25% in Group 1 and 3.4% in Group 2 was recorded. FIT is made up of seven
variables (interproximal, occlusion, design, mucosa,
bone, biology and margins); each of them to be evaluated using a 0-1-2 score.
The Mann-Whitney U test was applied for statistical analysis and the level of
significance was set at P< 0.05. Results: In Group 1, five complications were recorded, and four in Group 2, with a
failure rate of 6.25% and 6.17%, respectively. No statistically significant
difference was found between the experimental groups in any of the assessed
variables. The tested lithium disilicate material
brands showed comparable clinical performances after 4 years of clinical
service. (Am J Dent 2020;33:291-295).
Clinical significance: Clinicians can use either of the
tested lithium disilicate materials to make
adhesively luted partial crowns.
Mail: Prof. Marco Ferrari, Odontostomatologia, Policlinico Le
Scotte, Viale Bracci 1, Siena 53100, Italy. E-mail: ferrarm@gmail.com
The clinical accuracy of the implant digital
surgical guide: A meta-analysis
Fang Zhang, ms, Xue Gao, ms, Zhang-Yan Ye, ms, Dong-qian Xu, ms & Xi Ding, phd
Abstract: Purpose: To systematically evaluate the accuracy of clinical
applications of digital guides. Method: First, PubMed and Embase databases
were searched using the PICO standard. Eligible articles were included. Second,
the eligible articles were classified according to the different types. Next,
the NOS and ROB2 as evaluation indicators were used to evaluate the bias of
those included articles. Finally, sensitive factors were excluded through the
outcomes and data analyses were retrieved. Results: More than 1,562 articles were retrieved, and 38 in vivo research documents
were systematically analyzed after screening according to the inclusion
criteria, which mainly listed three aspects of the coronal, apical, and angular
implant data, and integrated the same type of articles in the study. To test
its heterogeneity, the P-values of those articles included in the analysis were
all less than 0.05. Finally, in the comparison between the guide group and the
free-hand group after excluding sensitive factors, the standardized mean difference (Std.MD) of the angle was
1.26 (95% CI 1.06, 1.47), the Std.MD of the apical point was 1.38 (95% CI 1.12,
1.63), and the Std.MD of the coronal point was 0.98 (95% CI 0.66, 1.29). Comparing
the maxillary and mandibular groups after excluding
sensitive factors, the Std.MD of the coronal point was -0.31 (95% CI -0.52,
-0.09), the Std.MD of the apical point was -0.15 [95% CI -0.34, 0.03], and the
Std.MD of the angle is -0.23 (95% CI -0.46, 0.01). Comparison between the
smoking group and the nonsmoking group, and between the flap group and the
flapless group showed that there was not enough evidence to make a reliable
assessment. (Am J Dent 2020;33:296-304).
Clinical significance: Compared
with free-hand operation, a digital guide is more accurate in the apex, the
coronal point and the angle, and the accuracy in the angle was very high. The
difference in accuracy between the maxillary and mandibular groups was not statistically significant. Other factors such as smoking habit
and flap need more clinical data.
Mail: Dr. Xi Ding, The First Affiliated Hospital of
Wenzhou Medical University, Ouhai District, Wenzhou City, P.R.China. E-mail: dingxi@wzhospital.cn
Antimicrobial effect and physical properties of an injectable “active
Kadiatou Sy, dds, msc, Joséphine Flamme, dds, Héloïse Macquet, dds, Feng Chai, dds, phd, Christel Neut, phd, Florence Siepmann, pharm d, phd & Kevimy Agossa, dds, phd
Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate an injectable gel, recently proposed for the controlled
release of “active oxygen” in periodontal pockets, compared to an antibiotic or
an antiseptic gel, respectively. Methods: The antimicrobial activity, injectability, texture
properties, swelling and water uptake of the gels were studied. Results: The “active oxygen” gel showed
a bactericidal effect comparable to the two commercially available drug
products (containing minocycline or chlorhexidine) on anaerobic periodontal pathogens and did
not seem to affect aerobic strains. The gel was easy to inject and stable in an
aqueous medium for several days. Texture analysis revealed potential gel
fragility. (Am J Dent 2020;33:305-309).
Clinical significance: The investigated gel for local
delivery of oxygen can help to selectively eradicate anaerobic bacteria
associated with periodontitis and promote the
recovery of a healthy-compatible oral flora.
Mail: Dr. Kevimy Agossa, Faculty
of Dental Surgery, University of Lille, Place de Verdun, 59000 Lille, France.
E-mail: kevimy.agossa@univ-lille.fr
Mechanical behavior and adhesive potential of glass
fiber-reinforced
Erlon Grando Merlo, dds, msc, Alvaro Della Bona, dds, msc, phd, Jason A. Griggs, msc, phd,
Abstract: Purpose: To characterize experimental
glass fiber-reinforced resin-based composites (GFIR-isophthalic;
and GFOR-orthophthalic), evaluating their mechanical
behavior and adhesive potential to ceramic in comparison to human dentin and a
traditional glass fiber-reinforced epoxy resin (G10). Methods: Density (ƿ), elastic modulus (E), and Poisson's ratio (v)
were evaluated using 2 mm thick specimens from GFIR, GFOR, human dentin and
G10. Biaxial flexural strength (σf), Knoop hardness and surface topography under scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) were assessed for GFIR and GFOR specimens. G10 was
also tested for σf. For the adhesive
potential, ceramic specimens (n=10) bonded to GFIR, GFOR or human dentin were
tested for microtensile bond strength (MTBS).
Disc-shaped ceramics were cemented onto dentin, GFIR, GFOR and G10 (n=15) and
loaded to failure. Data were statistically evaluated using Weibull,
ANOVA, and Tukey's test (α=0.05). Results: The experimental resins (GFIR
and GFOR) showed similar values of HK (53.1 and 52.7 GPa),
v (0.44 and 0.43) and σf (41.2 MPa and 40.7 MPa). Considering
the human dentin values for ƿ and E, the corresponding values obtained
from GFIR, GFOR and G10 were different, with GFOR values being closer to dentin
than GFIR and G10. G10 had statistically greater σf than GFIR and GFOR. Mean bond strength of ceramic to GFIR, GFOR and dentin were
statistically similar. The fracture load of resin-cemented ceramic was
influenced by substrate. (Am J Dent 2020;33:310-314).
Clinical significance: The experimental materials (GFIR
and GFOR) showed similar adhesion characteristics to human dentin, however GFOR
showed a better potential to be used as a dentin analogue.
Mail: Dr. Pedro Henrique Corazza,
Post-graduation Program in Dentistry, Dental School, University of Passo Fundo, Campus I, BR 285, Km 171, Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. E-mail: pedrocorazza@upf.br
Silver diamine fluoride and cleaning methods effects on dentin bond strength
Paulo Vitor Fernandes Braz, dds, ms, Andressa Fabro Luciano dos Santos, dds, ms, phd,
Abstract: Purpose: To assess the effect of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) application on bond strength of current
adhesive systems to caries-affected dentin and cleaning procedures to overcome
SDF’s influence on adhesion to dentin. Methods: 64 human third molars were randomly divided in eight groups for microshear bond strength testing (MBS). Samples of sound and
artificial caries-affected human dentin were treated or not with 38% SDF and
restored with an etch-and-rinse or a self-etch bonding system. For the cleaning
part, water, aluminum oxide, and pumice paste were used after SDF application to
determine whether SDF affected the bond strength to dentin. Fracture mode was
evaluated under scanning electron microscope. Data were statistically analyzed
by ANOVA. Results: SDF application
resulted in the lowest MBS for the self-etching adhesive system on
caries-affected dentin (P< 0.05). Cleaning with pumice slurry maintained the
MBS in SDF groups when compared to the control groups (not treated with SDF).
Fracture evaluation showed more adhesive failures on adhesive systems groups.
EDX analysis showed no silver particles when pumice paste was used for
cleaning. (Am J Dent 2020;33:315-319).
Clinical significance: Self-etch adhesive systems do
not seem appropriate for bonding SDF-treated dentin restora-tions.
Cleaning SDF-treated dentin with pumice paste reduced the negative effect of
SDF on resin-dentin bond strength. Etch-and-rinse adhesive systems seemed not
be affected by 38% SDF.
Mail: Dr. Ana Paula Ribeiro Dias, Department of Restorative Dental Sciences,
College of Dentistry, 1395 Center Drive, Room D1-11, University of Florida,
Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. E-mail: aribeiro@dental.ufl.edu
Ultrasonic
measurement of remaining dentin thickness
Ryosuke Murayama, me, dds, phd, Hiroyasu Kurokawa, dds, phd, Nicholas G.
Fischer, bs,
Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate the ability of a pencil-type transducer
connected to a pulser-receiver to measure remaining
dentin thickness (RDT). Methods: A total of 24 freshly extracted bovine
incisors were used to prepare dentin disks with certain thicknesses (0.5, 1.0,
1.5 and 2.0 mm). The thicknesses of the specimens were measured with an
ultrasonic technique using a pencil-type transducer, and the data obtained were
compared with the direct measurement obtained using a micrometer. The
Bland-Altman comparison method and paired t-test were performed at a 0.05
significance level. Results: The agreement between different measurement
methods was analyzed to evaluate the inter-methodology variation. The
Bland-Altman comparison method revealed a mean difference of 0.0098 ± 0.724 mm
between the ultrasonic technique and the direct measurement, with the 95%
Bland-Altman limits of agreement ranging from 0.1322 to 0.1517 mm. (Am J
Dent 2020;33:320-324).
Clinical
significance: Ultrasonic
measurement using the pencil-type transducer may be a promising method to
evaluate remaining dentin thickness.
Mail: Dr. Hiroyasu Kurokawa, Department of Operative Dentistry, Nihon
University School of Dentistry, 1-8-13, Kanda-Surugadai,
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8310, Japan. E-mail: kurokawa.hiroyasu@nihon-u.ac.jp
Effectiveness of two desensitizing products: A 6-month randomized
Leyla Kerimova, dds & Arlin Kiremitci, dds, phd
Abstract: Purpose: This randomized controlled clinical trial compared the
efficacy of a desensitizer containing calcium phosphate with a two-step
self-etch adhesive and placebo over a 6-month period. Methods: 50 subjects aged between 21-64 years with a sensitivity
score of 6 or higher according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in at least
three teeth participated in this study. Teethmate Desensitizer, Clearfil SE Bond 2, and placebo
(distilled water) were applied randomly to three teeth of each patient. Recall
reviews were performed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months
after treatment, and the sensitivity scores were assessed by air-blast
application. The normality of data was analyzed with Shapiro-Wilk. Since the placebo treatment was successful only in a
small number of teeth, the three materials could only be compared 10 minutes
after the treatment. Data were analyzed with Wilcoxon Test, Friedman and Dunn post-hoc tests (P= 0.05). Results: Sensitivity decreased significantly after application for each
of the three test groups when compared to the pretreatment condition (P<
0.05). There were no significant differences between the Teethmate Desensitizer and Clearfil SE Bond 2, and both
materials were more effective than the placebo (P< 0.05). (Am J Dent 2020;33:325-329).
Clinical significance: Teethmate Desensitizer and Clearfil SE Bond 2 had similar
desensitizing effects; both of them could be applied to treat dentin
hypersensitivity for a 6-month period.
Mail: Dr.
Leyla Kerimova, Department of Restorative Dentistry,
School of Dentistry, Baskent University, Yukarı Bahcelievler Mahallesi, 82. Sk. No: 26, 06490 Cankaya/Ankara,
Turkey. E-mail: leylakerim38@gmail.com, lkerimova@baskent.edu.tr
Effect of
light-curing time on microhardness of a restorative
bulk-fill
René Daher, dr med dent, phd, Stefano Ardu, dr med dent, phd, Cornelis J. Kleverlaan, phd, Enrico Di Bella, phd, Albert
J. Feilzer, dds, phd & Ivo Krejci, Prof. dr med dent
Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate the minimal irradiation time to reach a
sufficient polymerization of a photopoly-merizable restorative bulk-fill resin composite to lute endocrowns. Methods: A photopolymerizable restorative bulk-fill resin composite (Filtek One
Bulk Fill) was submitted to direct light-curing by a high power LED
light-curing unit for 20 seconds as the positive control group (n = 10). Five
more test groups (n= 10) were light-cured in a natural tooth mold from three
sites (buccal, palatal and occlusal)
under a 9.5 mm thick nanohybrid resin composite
CAD-CAM endocrown (Lava Ultimate A2 LT), for
different irradiation times: 90 seconds per site, 40 seconds per site, 30
seconds per site, 20 seconds per site and 10 seconds per site. Vickers microhardness measurements were made at two different
depths and test/control ratios were calculated. Ratios of 0.8 were considered
as an adequate level of curing. Results: Analysis shows that 30 seconds × 3 was the minimal irradiation time that
presented a test/control ratio above 0.8. Quantile regressions showed that the required irradiation time to reach a test/control
ratio of 0.8 at a confidence level of 95% was 38 seconds and 37 seconds for 200 μm and 500 μm,
respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between microhardness of the two depths except for the irradiation
time of 10 seconds. A 120-second (40 seconds per buccal,
palatal and occlusal site) light-curing of photopolymerizable bulk-fill resin composite to lute a
resin composite CAD-CAM endocrown restoration can be
considered sufficient to reach adequate polymerization. (Am J Dent 2020;33:331-336).
Clinical significance: Endocrowns are becoming more common as an alternative to conventional post and core
crowns. Luting endocrowns with restorative photopolymerizable resin composite,
instead of dual-cured resin composite cements presents multiple practical and
biomechanical advantages. However, the minimal light-curing duration has not
yet been established.
Mail: Dr. René Daher, Department of Cariology and Endodontology, University of Geneva, 1 rue
Michel-Servet, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland. E-mail: rene.daher@unige.ch